please wait, site is loading


12 Points Peace Agreement Nepal

Opublikowano: wrzesień 8th, 2021 by foto-klinika |

1.1. The name of this agreement is “Comprehensive Peace Agreement”. In short, the agreement must be called a peace agreement. The peace agreement provides a direction for elections for a Constituent Assembly (CA) after the formation of transitional legislation and government, including Maoists. In a detailed agreement on arms management, the Maoists pledged to confine their fighters and lock up their weapons under United Nations supervision; the Nepal Army (NA) will be largely limited to barracks. The Constituent Assembly, elected by a mixed system of first place and proportional representation, will also decide the future of the monarchy. Reaffirming the full commitment to the twelve-point agreement reached between seven political parties, CPN (Maoists), eight-point consensus, twenty-five code of conduct between the Government of Nepal and CPN (Maoists), decision taken at the November meeting between the leaders of seven political parties and CPN (Maoists). 8 2006, including all agreements, consensus, codes of conduct between the Government of Nepal and cpN (Maoist) and letters to the United Nations with similar positions; 4.6. In accordance with the commitment expressed in the letter to the United Nations, the Nepal Army is locked up in the barracks. Ensure that weapons are not used for or against any party. The Nepal Army must store the same amount of weapons in accordance with that of the Maoists and seal them with a single lock and give the key to the affected party.

In the case of an investigation into stockpiled weapons, the United Nations would do so in the presence of the party concerned. Prepare the details of the technology, including the surveillance camera, in accordance with the agreement between the Government of Nepal, the Maoists and the United Nations. Nepal will need international assistance for reconstruction, but fierce debates have already taken place on how to channel funds and make decisions. One of the side effects of the Nepalese peace process since 2006 is that the Nepalese establishment has become more effective with many of its donors. Relations between the government and parts of the international community, including the UN, are strained. . . .