please wait, site is loading

Blog

No Sender Agreement Configured That Matches the Message`s Header Fields in Sap Po

Opublikowano: marzec 5th, 2022 by foto-klinika |

Exception: Message header mapping error; The Agent class is CL_BUPA_ERP_REPL_IPA I selected ASMA in CC and the dummy name specified in the receiver file name and * in the sender`s CC. But I am always faced with a mistake like * is incomprehensible. Hi all! We need to create a REST service that accepts HTTP GET calls and retrieves PDF files from the REST client! How do I attach PDF files to the JSON response? Is that possible? Could someone provide the information, that is, it is possible to decrypt the encrypted file (public key) with SAPPGP, which does not use both keys, uses only one key for encryption. HELLO Yeeloonkhoo, First of all, I would like to thank you for writing the following blog, which is very very useful, I tried to follow your blog to make my IDOC to REST Asy/Sync as you mentioned in your blog rest receiver it did not replace the name of the module interface parameter, as mentioned in your blog, to use the name of the synchronous interface (as in 1. Scenario used), but when I use Synchronous InterfaceName in Sender Agreeemnt, in determining the interface, it does not identify the mapping of operations, I thought to take some advice from you. saprainbow.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/async_sync_2_id2_interface_determination.jpg Merry Christmas!! 🙂 Sincerely, Yee Loon To save the adapter attributes in the XI message header, set the license plate to Specify adapter-specific message attributes. The number of seconds the card has to wait if no files are found for processing. Type the name of the file that you want to process. The name can contain replacements. (replace exactly one character) so that you can select a list of files to process. ? If you want to send a text file with complex data structures to the integration engine or PCK for conversion to an XML document, select the conversion of the file content and perform the input required for conversion to the content conversion settings (see below). The main reason for the error is that the PI/PO runtime is trying to determine how the service interface works.

This must be compatible with the root XML element of the message. In this case, it is incompatible due to the SOAP envelope. A successful message mapping test does not necessarily mean that the scenario is configured correctly. When carrying out an integration project, I had the requirements to develop a JMS scenario in Soap XI. I had the challenge that the message on the JMS sender page has a SOAP envelope, but not the structure of the sender interface (client requirements). Another solution is to set the PROVIDER-side “Access-Control-Allow-Origin” CORS header. No configured sender agreement that matches the message header fields (sender part: “”, sender service: “abc”, interface: “aaa.com SI_XYZ_OS”, recipient part: “*”, receiving service: “*”) It`s hard to understand that you can get away with it, but you will! I configured a proxy file scenario with SOAP as the receiver using ICO objects utl_http.set_header(req, `User-Agent`, `Mozilla/4.0`); You want to process all files with the .txt extension, but exclude all files that begin with the letter “a”. To do this, enter “.txt for the file name and “a” for the exclusion mask. If NWDS – IFlow is used for configuration, do not touch the associated integrated configuration (ICo), as this can lead to inconsistencies that can lead to errors that cannot be found or not corrected. Successful message assignment tests do not necessarily mean that your scenario is configured correctly. File sender: scn.sap.com/thread/3205324: Hello Rajiv, “but if I use Synchronous InterfaceName in the sender accepts, when determining the interface, there is its non-identifying process assignment” So, for the sending agreement, you have the same behavior with mine. Recently, I haven`t been working D`Async/Sync Bridge with Sync REST Adapter.

In this blog by Alexey Pitroff, it was also mentioned that Async/Sync Bridge does not work with Sync RFC in which the transmitter adapter module must be used. See the comment in Figure 26 of his blog. scn.sap.com/community/pi-and-soa-middleware/blog/2014/03/27/bridges-construction-site-part-13-asynchronous-Synchron-Brücke For the determination of the interface: In this second flow to OM_RFC2FILE I use the synchronization interface of the 1. Flow, to determine the OM, you should be able to get a similar result this way. Check your OM again. Verify that iFlow/ICO is configured correctly and matches the values of the message header fields. If you are using iFlow, ensure that the deployment is successful by reviewing the deployment logs or by logging into the Swing client and verifying that the ICO was generated correctly. We have configured the “password” based SFTP adapter in the SAP PI 7.3 system with the server fingerprint and it works perfectly.

However, the server fingerprint is changed if the destination server is restarted, but the SFTP communication channel continues to function correctly. I`m wondering how server fingerprint changes affect SFTP CC? Hi Rajiv, “but if I use Synchronous Interfacename in the sender`s agreement, in determining the interface, it does not identify the mapping of operations” For the sender`s agreement: So you have the same behavior with mine. Recently I tried Async/Sync Bridge with Sync REST Adapter not working. In this blog by Alexey Pitroff, it was also mentioned that the async/sync bridge does not work with Sync RFC instead of using the module on the transmitter adapter. See the comment under Figure 26 on his blog. scn.sap.com/community/pi-and-soa-middleware/blog/2014/03/27/bridges-construction-site-part-13-asynchronous-Synchronous-Bridge For the determination of the interface: In this 2nd flow for OM_RFC2FILE, I use the synchronization interface of the 1st flow to determine the OM, they should be able to get a similar result in this way. Check your OM again. saprainbow.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/async_sync_2_id2_interface_determination.jpg Merry Christmas!! 🙂 Sincerely, Yee Loon In the previous post, Async/Sync Bridge is built via modules on the sender`s file adapter. In this entry, an asynchronous/synchronized bridge is executed through modules on the receiver`s RFC adapter. The high-level overview is always the same: Detailed overview: Now the modules are configured on the receiver`s RFC communication channel.

Explanation of the above flow with a focus on CC_RFC_ER1_RCV: a) First RequestResponseBean module change the message type from asynchronous to synchronous by changing the message header. c) The passThrough ReqRespBean true parameter passes the message to the next module string, rfcAFBean. d) SYNCHRONOUS RFC call to receive the rfc response and return to the third ResponseOnewayBean module. f) The ResponseOnewayBean module changes the synchronous message type to asynchronous. g) ResponseOnewayBean modules also have the parameters “interface” and “interfaceNamespace” and “replaceInterface”. Previously tested on RFC receiver adapters, the interface does not appear to be replaced by “SI_FULLNAME_OUT_ASYNC”. The sender`s agreement in the second scenario always required the use of the “SI_FNAME_LNAME_IN_SYNC” interface. However, the end result works well, can be translated into target TM and an output file can be generated. For a workaround, see the Shipper`s Agreement below.

h) Finally, the message goes through the second MO, is assigned to MT_FULLNAME and output in the recipient file. Configuring the module for CC_RFC_ER1_RCV: List of ESR objects: Imported RFC function module: List of objects ID: I selected ASMA in CC and the dummy names listed in the receiver file name and in the CC sender. But I`m always with mistakes like “is not understandable. Your email address will not be published. Required fields are checked – To apply the following attributes in the xi message headers, set the appropriate flags: Enter a code page under File Encoding. The default setting is to use the system code page, which is specific to the configuration of the installed operating system. The contents of the file are converted before being sent to the UTF-8 code page. The main reason for the error is that IP/PO availability tries to determine how the service interface works. This must be compatible with the root XML element of the message.

In this case, it is not compatible due to the SOAP envelope. CS for the first SCENARIO of FILE2RFC: CS for the second scenario of RFC2FILE: objects ID for the first scenario of FILE2RFC: Objects ID for the second scenario of RFC2FILE: CC_DUMMY_BRIDGE_FILE_SND is only an empty file adapter, is not used. Tried when I disable this adapter still works fine.. .